data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f277/1f277043273e30abd3a3daf2cffcd66c097ef014" alt=""
Teenagers are disengaged from many things; bill paying, social graces and hygiene come without thinking. But what suddenly occurred to me as I popped down to my local supermarket to do my shopping last weekend was how my hugely variable customer experiences in supermarkets past & present may well be explained by the employment contract behind the fresh-faced member of staff at the counter.
Example - I had a 15-minute conversation in Waitrose three weeks ago with a lovely man who was perfectly comfortable with the idea of picking me out a peachy number from the wine section that he said would perfectly compliment my pea and pancetta risotto. That’s just great customer service; having a guy who knows his job and knows his products is really fantastic. Juxtapose that with my experience Saturday gone with a different retailer when my question as to the whereabouts of the chocolate fingers was met with as vacant a 5-second stare as one could ever expect to receive and it clicked – it’s all about engagement.
Sadly I didn’t catch the name of my local wine expert three weeks ago, but as a token of my satisfaction with the peachy Viognier, let’s call him Oz. Similarly I didn’t use those empty 5-seconds to look at the teenager’s name badge on Saturday, but in honour of his teenage persona, let’s call him Kevin.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb174/fb1745520d853f58432f1db2967dcbc62a47bcec" alt=""
Trivialities aside, I don’t think this is a coincidence. Are companies who are trying to improve their customer service but employing lots of younger people on cheap wages and part-time or weekend contracts ultimately fighting a losing battle? Is employee engagement a pipe dream in this space?
Andrew Robson